The Russia-Ukraine Inversion: The Return of the Gods and the Twilight of Progressivism

— A structural prophecy based on current intelligence, aimed at analyzing potential geopolitical shifts: Written on November 22, 2025, the eve of the Swiss Negotiations.

When President Trump set Thanksgiving (November 27) as the deadline for his “28-Point Peace Framework,” the negotiation table in Geneva ceased to be merely a platform for resolving the Ukraine crisis; it became a symbol of the reconstruction of the global order. The framework proposes that Ukraine acknowledge the status quo in Crimea and the Donbas, limit its military personnel, and suspend its NATO accession, in exchange for U.S. security guarantees and reconstruction funding derived from frozen Russian assets.

However, the core significance of this negotiation lies in the fact that it marks a turning point for the “Progressive” order that has dominated for the past two centuries, and signifies a structural counter-offensive by “Conservative forces” against globalism. The battle lines are drawn; the final confrontation is inevitable.

Section I: The Russia-Ukraine Inversion — From American Outpost to Chinese Strategic Node

The proxy role of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict in 2022 has undergone a fundamental transformation by 2025. This shift is not accidental, but the inevitable result of the internal contradictions within the progressive order.

• The American Strategic Realignment:
  Upon the Trump administration taking office, U.S. military aid to Ukraine was placed under intense scrutiny. This was not an isolated move, but a critical step by the “Conservative Camp” to reallocate strategic resources. For the new conservative core in Washington, continued investment in a conflict led by globalists had become a primary burden hindering the “return to traditional values.” The Trump administration has made it clear that any “solution” to the Ukraine issue must serve American strategic priorities in the Indo-Pacific, rather than perpetuating a stalemate in Europe.

Section II: The Formation of the “Restorationist Alliance”

For two hundred years, the core belief of progressivism has been that nations can be rationally designed and managed, and that universal values supersede geopolitics and tradition. However, the strategic coordination between the U.S. and Russia serves as a thorough refutation of this superstition and a return to the dual realities of geopolitics and ideology.

The Geopolitical Dimension: The Natural Alliance of Land and Sea Power

Russia serves as the Land Power core of the Eurasian Heartland, while the United States stands as the Sea Power hegemon of the global maritime trade order. There is no fundamental geopolitical contradiction between the two. The classical theories of Mackinder and Mahan long ago posited that Land Power and Sea Power can easily join forces to counter a “hybrid threat” that challenges both. China, as a revisionist power possessing both continental depth and maritime ambition, is becoming exactly that—attempting to breach the Heartland containment while challenging U.S. naval supremacy through the “Belt and Road” and maritime expansion. This dual threat has pushed traditional geopolitical rivals into the same trench.

The Ideological Dimension: The Conservative Counter-Strike Against Progressivism

• Trump (America First): A return to traditional sovereignty, a strengthening of strongman politics, and opposition to supranational globalist management.
• Putin (The Third Rome): A return to imperial tradition, a revitalization of the Orthodox faith, and resistance against the export of Western liberal values.

These two leaders represent a return to traditional order; they share a common opposition to the bureaucracy of Brussels and the establishment elites of Washington. This strategic coordination is not merely a temporary compromise of interests, but a joint counter-attack by conservative forces against the progressive global order. Putin’s statement that Russia is willing to cooperate with the U.S. to address “globalist threats” marks Russia’s formal pivot from the “Anti-American Camp” to the “Anti-Globalist Camp,” signaling a complete break with the China-led “Progressive-Technocratic” route.

The Result: The U.S.-Russia alignment is not only a check on China’s geopolitical expansion but also a strategic encirclement of the “Technical Leviathan” of China and Europe—the final fortress of progressivism.

Section III: China-EU “Value Allies” — The Last Bastion of the Technical Leviathan

As the U.S. and Russia move toward alliance, the union of China and Europe becomes inevitable.

• The Isomorphism and Counter-Attack of Progressivism:
  Why can China and Europe join hands? Because they both subscribe to the same “Progressive Superstition.”
  • The EU: Believes society can be managed through supranational laws, welfare distribution, and environmental regulations.
  • China: Believes the economy can be managed through social engineering, big data surveillance, and state capitalism.

  They are the ultimate embodiments of the “Rational Bureaucracy.” Faced with Trump and Putin—guardians of tradition filled with “spiritual” vitality—these two highly stratified, technocratic systems feel an existential threat. Their union is the last line of defense built by the old order, which has sought for two centuries to replace “Rule” with “Management,” resisting the return of tradition.

Section IV: The Swiss Negotiations — The Final Lockdown of Strategic Camps

The consultations in Switzerland on November 23 will serve as a decisive watershed.

If Trump’s peace framework succeeds, Russia will gain space for a dignified strategic adjustment. However, the more likely scenario is this: backed by the “China-EU Axis,” Ukraine will refuse to accept the current conditions, and negotiations will collapse. This enduring confrontation will become the critical juncture where the strategic camps are finally locked in. This is not a simple geopolitical conflict; it is a necessary ordeal for the forces of conservative restoration as they enter the next phase, forcing the China-EU alliance to make good on its strategic commitments.

The deck is reshuffled; the battle lines are crystal clear.

Conclusion: The Wave of Value Return and the Beginning of an Epochal Shift

History has finally lifted its veil.

When Trump and Putin—two restorationists attempting to return to tradition and order—echo each other from Washington and Moscow, the chaos of the global order finally begins to draw to a close. This is a counter-offensive, delayed by two hundred years, launched by human civilization against the “Progressive Mirage” that has persisted since 1789.

The union of China and Europe is the final struggle of a “Systemic Order” (though it calls itself progressive) attempting to maintain the status quo through technology, management, and capital.

The negotiation table in Geneva will not bring a simple peace. Instead, it draws a sharp dividing line:

• On one side lies the “Roman Legion” (Conservative forces), attempting to return to tradition, sovereignty, and sanctity.
• On the other side stands the “Technical Leviathan” (Progressives & Globalists), attempting to maintain bureaucracy, management, and control.

The horn has sounded, the lines are drawn, and the allies are falling into formation. Both sides are completing their final strategic deployments, and the decisive battle for the soul of human civilization is slowly drawing back the curtain.

About The Author

Churchill Hunn

I am an independent political thinker and commentator, focusing on institutional analysis, conservative philosophy, and the underlying mechanisms of civilizational decline. My writing is grounded in an inquiry into the origins of liberty, a reflection on traditional values, and a long-term observation of the tension between personal conscience and authoritative order.
In an age driven by emotion and manipulated by discourse, I choose to return to reason and history in search of the foundations of thought. I believe the fate of civilization depends on a renewed recognition of truth, responsibility, and honor.
I founded Cospecto.com as a platform for critical thought, with a focus on international politics, Chinese history, and moral philosophy—a space where thought is still allowed to breathe.
My Work:
On Intellectual Density

See author's posts